CIT FUNDING CO, LLC
CIK 1082255Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Dec 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 558 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Schulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked May 2000 · Named in a filing · 296 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jan 2005 · Text search only · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McDermott Will & Emery | Dec 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 558 | 0.98 | 0.61 | 1.10 |
| Schulte Roth & Zabel | May 2000 | Named in a filing | 296 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 1.01 |
| Winston & Strawn | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.01 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jan 2005 | Text search only | 741 | 1.30 | 0.12 | 0.72 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Peter HumphreysMcDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Dec 2005 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 3.10× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- M. DAVID GALAINENAWinston & StrawnFirst linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter HumphreysMcDermott Will & Emery | Dec 2005 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 3.10 | 1.36 |
| M. DAVID GALAINENAWinston & Strawn | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |