IT Group Holdings Inc. ITGL (last ticker on record)
CIK 1081856Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brown & AssociatesFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Jackson & Campbell, P.C.First linked May 2007 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.71× · Went dark 2.45× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Michael PaigeFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 2.50× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- White & CaseFirst linked Aug 2001 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brown & Associates | Jun 2002 | Named in a filing | 19 | 1.19 | 0.47 | 0.55 |
| K&L Gates | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Jackson & Campbell, P.C. | May 2007 | Text search only | 11 | 2.71 | 2.45 | 0.91 |
| Michael Paige | May 2007 | Text search only | 20 | 1.20 | 2.50 | 0.84 |
| White & Case | Aug 2001 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Norman T. ReynoldsNorman T. Reynolds Law FirmFirst linked Jun 2003 · Named in a filing · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.23× · Went dark 1.29× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Harold H. MartinMartin & Pritchett, P.A.First linked Jun 2002 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.54× · Went dark 1.74× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Clayton E. ParkerK&L GatesFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 1.96× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Troy J. RilloK&L GatesFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 1.98× · 95% wipeout 0.57×
- Michael PaigeMichael PaigeFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 2.76× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- David GonzalezFirst linked Aug 2001 · Text search only · 91 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.69× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Norman T. ReynoldsNorman T. Reynolds Law Firm | Jun 2003 | Named in a filing | 41 | 2.23 | 1.29 | 0.88 |
| Harold H. MartinMartin & Pritchett, P.A. | Jun 2002 | Named in a filing | 30 | 2.54 | 1.74 | 1.31 |
| Clayton E. ParkerK&L Gates | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 129 | 1.18 | 1.96 | 1.28 |
| Troy J. RilloK&L Gates | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 30 | 1.52 | 1.98 | 0.57 |
| Michael PaigeMichael Paige | May 2007 | Text search only | 21 | 1.52 | 2.76 | 0.82 |
| David Gonzalez | Aug 2001 | Text search only | 91 | 1.34 | 1.69 | 0.76 |