Elys BMG Group, Inc. ELYS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1080319Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Oct 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Feb 2021 to Jul 2024
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Blank RomeFirst linked Jun 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Gracin & Marlow, LLPFirst linked Oct 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 2.34× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blank Rome | Jun 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
| Gracin & Marlow, LLP | Oct 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 55 | 0.97 | 2.34 | 1.38 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hank GracinGracin & Marlow, LLPFirst linked Oct 2018 · Named in a filing · 77 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 2.28× · 95% wipeout 1.53×
- Leslie MarlowBlank RomeFirst linked Oct 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 71 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 2.60× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Patrick J. EganGracin & Marlow, LLPFirst linked Oct 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 1.84× · 95% wipeout 1.89×
- Richard I. AnslowEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Dec 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 153 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- William J. ReillyFirst linked Jul 2005 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hank GracinGracin & Marlow, LLP | Oct 2018 | Named in a filing | 77 | 0.66 | 2.28 | 1.53 |
| Leslie MarlowBlank Rome | Oct 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 71 | 0.58 | 2.60 | 1.43 |
| Patrick J. EganGracin & Marlow, LLP | Oct 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 43 | 0.40 | 1.84 | 1.89 |
| Richard I. AnslowEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Dec 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 153 | 1.23 | 1.12 | 0.95 |
| William J. Reilly | Jul 2005 | Named in a filing | 9 | 2.11 | 0.00 | 1.13 |