CONSTELLATION 3D INC CDDD (last ticker on record)
CIK 1080290Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2001
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Nov 2000 to Apr 2002
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Dec 2001 · Named in a filing · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Blank RomeFirst linked Oct 2000 · Named in a filing · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Gottbetter & Partners, LLPFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Littman KrooksFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.65× · 95% wipeout 2.07×
- Thelen Reid & PriestFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 124 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 1.16× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker & McKenzie | Dec 2001 | Named in a filing | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Blank Rome | Oct 2000 | Named in a filing | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
| Gottbetter & Partners, LLP | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 69 | 1.44 | 1.38 | 1.01 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Littman Krooks | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 32 | 0.88 | 0.65 | 2.07 |
| Thelen Reid & Priest | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 124 | 0.98 | 1.16 | 1.20 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David E. WellsHunton & WilliamsFirst linked Dec 2001 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 3.07× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Mitchell C. LittmanLittman KrooksFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 1.43× · 95% wipeout 2.47×
- Alan H. LieblichBlank RomeFirst linked Feb 2001 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 1.58× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Alan L. ZeigerBlank RomeFirst linked Feb 2001 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.50× · 95% wipeout 2.02×
- David J. LevensonVenable LLPFirst linked Feb 2001 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 2.82× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David E. WellsHunton & Williams | Dec 2001 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 3.07 | 0.00 |
| Mitchell C. LittmanLittman Krooks | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 14 | 0.64 | 1.43 | 2.47 |
| Alan H. LieblichBlank Rome | Feb 2001 | Text search only | 11 | 0.83 | 1.58 | 1.48 |
| Alan L. ZeigerBlank Rome | Feb 2001 | Text search only | 5 | 0.00 | 2.50 | 2.02 |
| David J. LevensonVenable LLP | Feb 2001 | Text search only | 11 | 0.89 | 2.82 | 0.96 |