EDGAR ONLINE INC EDGR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1080224Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Feb 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Golenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLPFirst linked Sep 2008 · Named in a filing · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 1.50× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Littman KrooksFirst linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.65× · 95% wipeout 2.07×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morgan Lewis | Feb 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Golenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLP | Sep 2008 | Named in a filing | 55 | 0.59 | 1.50 | 1.41 |
| Littman Krooks | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 32 | 0.88 | 0.65 | 2.07 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mitchell C. LittmanLittman KrooksFirst linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 1.43× · 95% wipeout 2.47×
- Steven D. UslanerLittman KrooksFirst linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.36×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mitchell C. LittmanLittman Krooks | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.64 | 1.43 | 2.47 |
| Steven D. UslanerLittman Krooks | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 15 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 2.36 |