WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER CO WEC (last ticker on record)
CIK 107815Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2004
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in a filing · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLPFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in a filing · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Troutman Sanders LLPFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in a filing · 335 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Quarles & BradyFirst linked Nov 1995 · Named in a filing · 170 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Pepper HamiltonFirst linked Feb 2021 · Text search only · 340 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Loomis Ewert Parsley Davis & GottingFirst linked Nov 2002 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.86×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP | Mar 2021 | Named in a filing | 161 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 154 | 1.18 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| Hunton & Williams | Nov 2013 | Named in a filing | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| Troutman Sanders LLP | Aug 2007 | Named in a filing | 335 | 1.15 | 0.61 | 1.16 |
| Quarles & Brady | Nov 1995 | Named in a filing | 170 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.79 |
| Pepper Hamilton | Feb 2021 | Text search only | 340 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 1.13 |
| Loomis Ewert Parsley Davis & Gotting | Nov 2002 | Text search only | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.86 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Eric A. KoontzTroutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLPFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- John T. W. MercerTroutman Sanders LLPFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Bruce C. DavidsonQuarles & BradyFirst linked Nov 1995 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eric A. KoontzTroutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 2.38 | 0.00 | 1.35 |
| John T. W. MercerTroutman Sanders LLP | Aug 2007 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.45 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Bruce C. DavidsonQuarles & Brady | Nov 1995 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.41 | 0.00 | 1.59 |