Meet Group, Inc. MEET (last ticker on record)

CIK 1078099Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

Restatement
Restructuring
Delisting notice (not a red flag)

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 2; Newest began Jun 2012
Largest fall in its shares: —; None of 95% on record
Law firms: 11; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 8; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

Sep 4, 2020Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 3, 2014Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jun 29, 2012Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 10, 2009Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Aug 13, 2008Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jun 30, 2008Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jun 2, 2008Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 9, 2008Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Oct 22, 2007Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
May 23, 2007Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
Apr 13, 2007Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jan 26, 2007Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
Jan 24, 2007Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Morgan Lewis	Feb 2013	Named in SEC correspondence	1,028	1.18	0.31	1.02
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings	Aug 2011	Named in a filing	58	1.11	0.00	0.73
Harris Cramer LLP	Jun 2010	Named in SEC correspondence	16	1.02	1.52	2.96
Snell & Wilmer	Jan 2007	Named in a filing	244	1.34	1.19	1.38
Gallagher & Kennedy	Oct 2001	Named in a filing	32	0.44	0.98	1.05
Kummer Kaempfer Bonner & Renshaw	Apr 1999	Named in a filing	35	0.78	1.71	1.30
Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP	Mar 1999	Named in a filing	223	0.67	0.75	0.97
Law Office of Gary A. Agron	Mar 1999	Named in a filing	40	0.68	1.39	0.75
Gunderson Dettmer	Aug 2011	Text search only	333	1.17	0.66	1.32
JUSTEENE BLANKENSHIP	Aug 2011	Text search only	20	1.36	2.40	1.71
Willkie Farr	Aug 2011	Text search only	539	1.23	0.40	0.84

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
James W. McKenzie Jr.Morgan Lewis	Feb 2013	Named in SEC correspondence	35	0.71	0.00	2.70
Brian S. BernsteinNason, Yeager, Gerson, Harris & Fumero, P.A.	Dec 2010	Named in SEC correspondence	21	1.45	1.13	1.93
Michael D. HarrisNason, Yeager, Gerson, Harris & Fumero, P.A.	Dec 2010	Named in SEC correspondence	37	1.44	1.26	1.85
David P. LewisDLA Piper	Jan 2007	Named in SEC correspondence	19	0.76	0.00	0.88
MATTHEW P. FEENEYSnell & Wilmer	Jan 2007	Named in a filing	8	0.82	1.60	0.00
Jeffrey M. KnetschBrownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP	Apr 1999	Named in a filing	16	0.50	1.95	1.22
Gary A. AgronLaw Office of Gary A. Agron	Mar 1999	Named in a filing	43	0.64	1.35	0.99
Maurice M. LefkortWillkie Farr	Oct 2006	Text search only	18	1.51	0.00	1.05