REMEDENT, INC. REMI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1078037Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2004
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Locke LordFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 179 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Bullivant Houser Bailey PCFirst linked Oct 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Bartel Eng & SchroderFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 1.36× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Oswald & YapFirst linked Jul 2002 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.48× · Went dark 1.66× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- SENN PALUMBO MEULEMANSFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.22× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Locke Lord | Mar 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 179 | 1.70 | 0.54 | 1.00 |
| Bullivant Houser Bailey PC | Oct 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.99 |
| Bartel Eng & Schroder | Aug 2005 | Named in a filing | 24 | 0.79 | 1.36 | 0.69 |
| Oswald & Yap | Jul 2002 | Named in a filing | 25 | 1.48 | 1.66 | 1.15 |
| SENN PALUMBO MEULEMANS | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.06 | 1.22 | 0.00 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kevin F. BarrettGottbetter & Partners, LLPFirst linked Sep 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Deborah K. SeoBullivant Houser Bailey PCFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Scott E. BartelLewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLPFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Lynne BolducFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.07× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kevin F. BarrettGottbetter & Partners, LLP | Sep 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 1.48 | 0.00 | 0.79 |
| Deborah K. SeoBullivant Houser Bailey PC | Sep 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.16 |
| Scott E. BartelLewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP | Aug 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 1.36 | 0.73 | 0.81 |
| Lynne Bolduc | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 22 | 2.07 | 0.97 | 1.15 |