R TEC TECHNOLOGIES INC
CIK 1077890Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2001
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 0
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jack H. HalperinFirst linked Oct 2001 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.31× · Went dark 1.16× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- James N. BarberFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 1.19× · 95% wipeout 0.36×
- Bruce BrashearFirst linked Jun 1999 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 2.21× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jack H. Halperin | Oct 2001 | Named in a filing | 6 | 3.31 | 1.16 | 0.00 |
| James N. Barber | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 24 | 1.17 | 1.19 | 0.36 |
| Bruce Brashear | Jun 1999 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.00 | 2.21 | 1.17 |