ASURA DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC. IAGI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1077634Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Dec 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- 95%
- Feb 2010 to Dec 2011
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Snell & WilmerFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in a filing · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.19× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Arnold & PorterFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in a filing · 254 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Sonnenschein Nath & RosenthalFirst linked Mar 2001 · Named in a filing · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Cooperman Levitt Winikoff Lester & Newman, P.C.First linked Feb 1999 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 1.96× · 95% wipeout 3.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Snell & Wilmer | Dec 2009 | Named in a filing | 244 | 1.34 | 1.19 | 1.38 |
| Arnold & Porter | Jun 2004 | Named in a filing | 254 | 1.03 | 0.11 | 0.84 |
| Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal | Mar 2001 | Named in a filing | 160 | 1.08 | 0.56 | 1.23 |
| Cooperman Levitt Winikoff Lester & Newman, P.C. | Feb 1999 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.15 | 1.96 | 3.92 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Daniel M. MahoneySnell & WilmerFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.25× · Went dark 2.04× · 95% wipeout 1.65×
- Kevin J. LavinArnold & PorterFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Ira I. RoxlandSonnenschein Nath & RosenthalFirst linked Feb 1999 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.96× · 95% wipeout 2.82×
- Paul D. FreshourArnold & PorterFirst linked Aug 2005 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 2.04× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel M. MahoneySnell & Wilmer | Dec 2009 | Named in a filing | 9 | 2.25 | 2.04 | 1.65 |
| Kevin J. LavinArnold & Porter | Jun 2004 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.16 | 0.00 | 1.22 |
| Ira I. RoxlandSonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal | Feb 1999 | Named in a filing | 26 | 1.19 | 0.96 | 2.82 |
| Paul D. FreshourArnold & Porter | Aug 2005 | Text search only | 9 | 0.77 | 2.04 | 1.33 |