DBUB GROUP, INC CHCG (last ticker on record)
CIK 1076784Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restatement
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began May 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Mar 2018 · Named in a filing · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Lewis and RocaFirst linked May 2009 · Named in a filing · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 1.60× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Jul 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Berkman Henoch Peterson & PeddyFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 4.02× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Mar 2018 | Named in a filing | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Lewis and Roca | May 2009 | Named in a filing | 46 | 1.25 | 1.60 | 1.33 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Jul 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| Berkman Henoch Peterson & Peddy | Mar 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.27 | 4.02 | 1.15 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Angela M. DowdLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Jul 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 1.45× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
- Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Jul 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 391 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.93× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Jeffrey M. SteinKing & SpaldingFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.59× · Went dark 4.13× · 95% wipeout 1.95×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angela M. DowdLoeb & Loeb LLP | Jul 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 34 | 0.94 | 1.45 | 1.52 |
| Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLP | Jul 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 391 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 1.21 |
| Jeffrey M. SteinKing & Spalding | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 34 | 1.59 | 4.13 | 1.95 |