CDC CORP CDCAQ (last ticker on record)
CIK 1076770Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2001
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Mar 2000 to Nov 2011
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Oct 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Oct 2003 · Named in a filing · 1,145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Oct 2003 · Named in a filing · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Jan 2004 · Text search only · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Oct 2003 · Text search only · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| King & Spalding | Oct 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.01 |
| Maples and Calder | Oct 2003 | Named in a filing | 1,145 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.90 |
| Paul Hastings | Oct 2003 | Named in a filing | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.08 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Jan 2004 | Text search only | 826 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.14 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Oct 2003 | Text search only | 439 | 1.01 | 0.35 | 0.70 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- E. William Bates IIKing & SpaldingFirst linked Jul 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Stephen M. WisemanKing & SpaldingFirst linked Jul 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.63×
- James H. Ball Jr.Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Jan 2004 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- MARK L. WEISSLERMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Oct 2003 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 4.27× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Thomas M. Britt IIIDebevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.67×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E. William Bates IIKing & Spalding | Jul 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 2.53 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| Stephen M. WisemanKing & Spalding | Jul 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.85 | 0.00 | 1.63 |
| James H. Ball Jr.Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Jan 2004 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.97 |
| MARK L. WEISSLERMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Oct 2003 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.68 | 4.27 | 0.00 |
| Thomas M. Britt IIIDebevoise & Plimpton | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.67 |