IESI CORP
CIK 1076103Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- STEPHEN A. ZRENDA, JR., P.C.First linked Oct 2002 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.61× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Bingham DanaFirst linked Aug 2002 · Text search only · 104 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.37× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Aug 2002 · Text search only · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Drinker Biddle & ReathFirst linked Aug 2002 · Text search only · 213 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Aug 2002 · Text search only · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Kelly Hart & HallmanFirst linked Aug 2002 · Text search only · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2002 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Aug 2002 · Text search only · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Aug 2002 · Text search only · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STEPHEN A. ZRENDA, JR., P.C. | Oct 2002 | Text search only | 25 | 2.61 | 1.06 | 1.11 |
| Bingham Dana | Aug 2002 | Text search only | 104 | 1.37 | 0.54 | 1.14 |
| Debevoise & Plimpton | Aug 2002 | Text search only | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 1.04 |
| Drinker Biddle & Reath | Aug 2002 | Text search only | 213 | 1.46 | 0.77 | 1.25 |
| Hogan & Hartson | Aug 2002 | Text search only | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.18 |
| Kelly Hart & Hallman | Aug 2002 | Text search only | 30 | 0.57 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Aug 2002 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Aug 2002 | Text search only | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Ropes & Gray | Aug 2002 | Text search only | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel S. EvansRopes & Gray | Aug 2002 | Text search only | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |