Trimerica Energy Corp TECO (last ticker on record)
CIK 1075773Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Went dark (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Apr 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Whitley LLP Attorneys at LawFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.06× · Went dark 2.94× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Pepper HamiltonFirst linked Jan 2006 · Named in a filing · 340 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in a filing · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Jonathan D. LeinwandFirst linked Jul 2002 · Named in a filing · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 1.55× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whitley LLP Attorneys at Law | Feb 2011 | Named in a filing | 14 | 3.06 | 2.94 | 0.91 |
| Pepper Hamilton | Jan 2006 | Named in a filing | 340 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 1.13 |
| K&L Gates | Mar 2004 | Named in a filing | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Jonathan D. Leinwand | Jul 2002 | Named in a filing | 42 | 1.11 | 1.55 | 1.26 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Robert B. MurphyPepper HamiltonFirst linked Jan 2006 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.80× · Went dark 4.05× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Clayton E. ParkerK&L GatesFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in a filing · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 1.96× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Harris C. SiskindK&L GatesFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 1.60× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Jonathan D. LeinwandJonathan D. LeinwandFirst linked Nov 2000 · Named in a filing · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 1.82× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert B. MurphyPepper Hamilton | Jan 2006 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.80 | 4.05 | 0.75 |
| Clayton E. ParkerK&L Gates | Mar 2004 | Named in a filing | 129 | 1.18 | 1.96 | 1.28 |
| Harris C. SiskindK&L Gates | Mar 2004 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.29 | 1.60 | 0.70 |
| Jonathan D. LeinwandJonathan D. Leinwand | Nov 2000 | Named in a filing | 41 | 1.19 | 1.82 | 1.17 |