FAB Universal Corp. FU (last ticker on record)
CIK 1074909Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Oct 2019
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- RAY, QUINNEY & NEBEKERFirst linked Dec 1998 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.04× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 1.74×
- Feldman WeinsteinFirst linked Jul 2007 · Text search only · 278 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Grushko & MittmanFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 103 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 2.53× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAY, QUINNEY & NEBEKER | Dec 1998 | Named in a filing | 22 | 2.04 | 1.33 | 1.74 |
| Feldman Weinstein | Jul 2007 | Text search only | 278 | 0.92 | 1.17 | 1.20 |
| Grushko & Mittman | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 103 | 1.19 | 2.53 | 1.25 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Leonard W. BurninghamBrunson Chandler & Jones, PLLCFirst linked Oct 2001 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 1.54× · 95% wipeout 1.62×
- A. ROBERT THORUPRAY, QUINNEY & NEBEKERFirst linked Dec 1998 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 1.71× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leonard W. BurninghamBrunson Chandler & Jones, PLLC | Oct 2001 | Named in a filing | 36 | 1.41 | 1.54 | 1.62 |
| A. ROBERT THORUPRAY, QUINNEY & NEBEKER | Dec 1998 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.68 | 1.71 | 0.00 |