EMPYREAN BIOSCIENCE INC
CIK 1074626Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 1,005 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Benesch Friedlander Coplan & AronoffFirst linked Sep 2000 · Named in a filing · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Snell & WilmerFirst linked Jul 1999 · Named in a filing · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.19× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Kaye ScholerFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Gottbetter & Partners, LLPFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Stroock & Stroock & LavanFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 178 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Ulmer & BerneFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.49× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 1,005 | 1.27 | 1.62 | 1.26 |
| Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff | Sep 2000 | Named in a filing | 55 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.31 |
| Snell & Wilmer | Jul 1999 | Named in a filing | 244 | 1.34 | 1.19 | 1.38 |
| Kaye Scholer | May 2002 | Text search only | 161 | 0.88 | 1.03 | 1.00 |
| Gottbetter & Partners, LLP | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 69 | 1.44 | 1.38 | 1.01 |
| Stroock & Stroock & Lavan | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 178 | 0.98 | 0.78 | 0.96 |
| Ulmer & Berne | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 34 | 1.22 | 0.49 | 1.18 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gregory SichenziaSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 267 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.46× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Steven D. PidgeonDLA PiperFirst linked Oct 1999 · Named in a filing · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- David GonzalezFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 91 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.69× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gregory SichenziaSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 267 | 1.06 | 1.46 | 1.24 |
| Steven D. PidgeonDLA Piper | Oct 1999 | Named in a filing | 42 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 1.08 |
| David Gonzalez | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 91 | 1.34 | 1.69 | 0.76 |