WILSHIRE ENTERPRISES INC EVN (last ticker on record)
CIK 107454Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Jan 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Lowenstein SandlerFirst linked Jul 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 297 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Dechert LLPFirst linked Apr 2009 · Text search only · 434 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Herrick, Feinstein LLPFirst linked Jul 2008 · Text search only · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 1.94× · 95% wipeout 0.32×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Jan 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 305 | 1.14 | 0.24 | 0.95 |
| Lowenstein Sandler | Jul 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 297 | 1.12 | 0.70 | 1.42 |
| Dechert LLP | Apr 2009 | Text search only | 434 | 0.84 | 0.41 | 0.96 |
| Herrick, Feinstein LLP | Jul 2008 | Text search only | 47 | 0.53 | 1.94 | 0.32 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dennis J. BlockCadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Jan 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Laura R. KuntzLowenstein SandlerFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 1.09× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Peter H. EhrenbergLowenstein SandlerFirst linked Jul 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dennis J. BlockCadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Jan 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 49 | 1.46 | 0.73 | 1.23 |
| Laura R. KuntzLowenstein Sandler | Sep 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 1.00 | 1.09 | 0.00 |
| Peter H. EhrenbergLowenstein Sandler | Jul 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 0.98 | 0.60 | 1.42 |