BOTTOMLINE TECHNOLOGIES INC EPAY (last ticker on record)
CIK 1073349Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Apr 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2022 · Named in a filing · 1,688 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Nov 1998 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | May 2022 | Named in a filing | 1,688 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jun 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.23 |
| HALE AND DORR | Nov 1998 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.22 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David A. WestenbergWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in a filing · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- John A. BurgessHALE AND DORRFirst linked Nov 1998 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.80× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Philip P. RossettiHALE AND DORRFirst linked Nov 1998 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David A. WestenbergWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jun 2010 | Named in a filing | 31 | 1.04 | 0.00 | 1.10 |
| John A. BurgessHALE AND DORR | Nov 1998 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 0.99 | 0.80 | 0.75 |
| Philip P. RossettiHALE AND DORR | Nov 1998 | Named in a filing | 27 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 1.39 |