DAVEL COMMUNICATIONS INC DAVL (last ticker on record)
CIK 1072881Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Schiff HardinFirst linked Feb 2005 · Named in a filing · 184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Nov 1998 · Named in a filing · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- R. Scott FalkFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.41×
- Rosenberg & LiebentrittFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schiff Hardin | Feb 2005 | Named in a filing | 184 | 0.78 | 0.85 | 1.26 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Nov 1998 | Named in a filing | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| R. Scott Falk | May 2002 | Text search only | 21 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 0.41 |
| Rosenberg & Liebentritt | May 2002 | Text search only | 6 | 0.57 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ernest M. SternCulhane Meadows PLLCFirst linked Feb 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 1.50× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- R. Scott FalkKirkland & EllisFirst linked Dec 2000 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.44×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ernest M. SternCulhane Meadows PLLC | Feb 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 0.73 | 1.50 | 1.14 |
| R. Scott FalkKirkland & Ellis | Dec 2000 | Named in a filing | 19 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 0.44 |