INTERDENT INC DENTQ (last ticker on record)
CIK 1072765Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2001
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- May 1999 to Aug 2003
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stoel RivesFirst linked Apr 2005 · Named in a filing · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Apr 2001 · Named in a filing · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Oct 1998 · Named in a filing · 558 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stoel Rives | Apr 2005 | Named in a filing | 208 | 0.84 | 0.67 | 1.15 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Apr 2001 | Named in a filing | 826 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.14 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Oct 1998 | Named in a filing | 558 | 0.98 | 0.61 | 1.10 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Paul Hastings | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.08 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ben ChungMorrison & Foerster | Jun 2005 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 1.47 |