GOLD RESERVE LTD GDRZF (last ticker on record)
CIK 1072725Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Jun 2021 · Named in a filing · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Norton RoseFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in a filing · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Fasken MartineauFirst linked May 2006 · Named in a filing · 126 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Apr 1999 · Named in SEC correspondence · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Macleod DixonFirst linked Jan 2007 · Text search only · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.46× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| King & Spalding | Jun 2021 | Named in a filing | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.04 |
| Norton Rose | Sep 2014 | Named in a filing | 304 | 1.11 | 0.52 | 1.24 |
| Fasken Martineau | May 2006 | Named in a filing | 126 | 1.03 | 0.37 | 0.87 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Apr 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Macleod Dixon | Jan 2007 | Text search only | 31 | 0.46 | 0.57 | 1.49 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Albert G. McGrath Jr.Baker & McKenzieFirst linked May 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- William D. Davis IIBaker & McKenzieFirst linked Jan 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
- Jonathan B. NewtonBaker & McKenzieFirst linked Dec 1999 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Alan G. HarveyBaker & McKenzieFirst linked Apr 1999 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert G. McGrath Jr.Baker & McKenzie | May 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 1.43 |
| William D. Davis IIBaker & McKenzie | Jan 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 1.50 |
| Jonathan B. NewtonBaker & McKenzie | Dec 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 1.66 | 0.00 | 0.99 |
| Alan G. HarveyBaker & McKenzie | Apr 1999 | Named in a filing | 17 | 1.51 | 1.01 | 1.35 |