NORTHWEST BIOTHERAPEUTICS INC NWBO (last ticker on record)
CIK 1072379Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Oct 2019
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Apr 2010 to Jun 2017
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kane Kessler, P.C.First linked Nov 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.59× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Oct 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Wyrick Robbins Yates & Ponton LLPFirst linked Aug 2013 · Named in a filing · 113 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Sichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Jun 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,005 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Tarter Krinsky & Drogin LLPFirst linked May 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 0.84× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in a filing · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Lane Powell PCFirst linked Aug 2001 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Oct 2001 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kane Kessler, P.C. | Nov 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 58 | 1.27 | 1.59 | 0.98 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Oct 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Wyrick Robbins Yates & Ponton LLP | Aug 2013 | Named in a filing | 113 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 1.07 |
| Sichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Jun 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,005 | 1.27 | 1.62 | 1.26 |
| Tarter Krinsky & Drogin LLP | May 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 1.69 | 0.84 | 1.16 |
| Covington & Burling | Nov 2007 | Named in a filing | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.99 |
| Lane Powell PC | Aug 2001 | Named in a filing | 36 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 0.85 |
| Morgan Lewis | Oct 2001 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brian LaneGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Oct 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
- Glenn R. PollnerGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Oct 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.62×
- Daniel I. GoldbergCooley LLPFirst linked Jun 2012 · Named in a filing · 184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Jeffrey J. FesslerSheppard MullinFirst linked Jun 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Peter CampitielloKane Kessler, P.C.First linked May 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.15× · Went dark 1.30× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- David H. EngvallCovington & BurlingFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.60×
- William W. LinLane Powell PCFirst linked Feb 2002 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.32× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Michael E. MorganLane Powell PCFirst linked Aug 2001 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Eric ScarazzoGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Apr 2018 · Text search only · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Yvan-Claude PierreReed SmithFirst linked Jun 2012 · Text search only · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.96× · Went dark 1.66× · 95% wipeout 2.33×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian LaneGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Oct 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 52 | 1.93 | 0.00 | 0.71 |
| Glenn R. PollnerGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Oct 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 1.62 |
| Daniel I. GoldbergCooley LLP | Jun 2012 | Named in a filing | 184 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Jeffrey J. FesslerSheppard Mullin | Jun 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 56 | 0.86 | 0.37 | 1.21 |
| Peter CampitielloKane Kessler, P.C. | May 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 55 | 2.15 | 1.30 | 1.37 |
| David H. EngvallCovington & Burling | Nov 2007 | Named in a filing | 16 | 1.93 | 0.00 | 1.60 |
| William W. LinLane Powell PC | Feb 2002 | Named in a filing | 5 | 2.32 | 0.00 | 1.12 |
| Michael E. MorganLane Powell PC | Aug 2001 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.44 | 0.00 | 1.24 |
| Eric ScarazzoGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Apr 2018 | Text search only | 30 | 1.45 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Yvan-Claude PierreReed Smith | Jun 2012 | Text search only | 30 | 1.96 | 1.66 | 2.33 |