LASER ENERGETICS INC
CIK 1072072Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked May 2006 · Named in a filing · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Stark & StarkFirst linked May 2006 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.58× · Went dark 1.31× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- STEPHEN A. ZRENDA, JR., P.C.First linked May 2006 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.61× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kramer Levin Naftalis | May 2006 | Named in a filing | 304 | 0.95 | 0.68 | 1.16 |
| Stark & Stark | May 2006 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.58 | 1.31 | 1.13 |
| Baker & McKenzie | May 2006 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| STEPHEN A. ZRENDA, JR., P.C. | May 2006 | Text search only | 25 | 2.61 | 1.06 | 1.11 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Scott S. RosenblumKramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked May 2006 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- Mark A. RobertsonFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.66× · Went dark 1.09× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott S. RosenblumKramer Levin Naftalis | May 2006 | Named in a filing | 21 | 0.77 | 0.41 | 1.40 |
| Mark A. Robertson | May 2006 | Text search only | 10 | 1.66 | 1.09 | 0.90 |