ARCADIA RESOURCES, INC KAD (last ticker on record)
CIK 1071941Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Sep 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Aug 2002 to Oct 2014
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ice MillerFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in a filing · 112 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Jul 2009 · Named in a filing · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Fennemore CraigFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in a filing · 99 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- MARQUIS & AURBACHFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Snow Becker Krauss P.C.First linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.50× · Went dark 1.67× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ice Miller | Dec 2009 | Named in a filing | 112 | 1.19 | 0.21 | 0.93 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Jul 2009 | Named in a filing | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Fennemore Craig | Mar 2007 | Named in a filing | 99 | 1.13 | 0.59 | 1.10 |
| MARQUIS & AURBACH | Jun 2005 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| HALE AND DORR | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Snow Becker Krauss P.C. | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 37 | 1.50 | 1.67 | 1.42 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David C. WrightHunton & Williams | Mar 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 0.24 |