BRASKEM SA BAK (last ticker on record)
CIK 1071438Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 20-F (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- White & CaseFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Emmet Marvin & MartinFirst linked Sep 2004 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Chadbourne & ParkeFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.62× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maples and Calder | Dec 2013 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| White & Case | Apr 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Emmet Marvin & Martin | Sep 2004 | Text search only | 199 | 0.81 | 0.16 | 0.85 |
| Chadbourne & Parke | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 110 | 1.64 | 0.62 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mark O. BagnallWhite & CaseFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.06× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Donald BakerWhite & CaseFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark O. BagnallWhite & Case | Oct 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 3.06 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Donald BakerWhite & Case | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 15 | 1.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 |