Pinnacle Summer Investments, Inc. EF (last ticker on record)
CIK 1071341Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Mar 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Thompson & KnightFirst linked Feb 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 198 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Porter & HedgesFirst linked Oct 1998 · Named in a filing · 108 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 398 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thompson & Knight | Feb 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 198 | 1.03 | 0.40 | 1.38 |
| Porter & Hedges | Oct 1998 | Named in a filing | 108 | 1.13 | 0.36 | 1.44 |
| Andrews Kurth LLP | May 2006 | Text search only | 398 | 1.27 | 0.35 | 1.30 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Amy R. CurtisThompson & KnightFirst linked May 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Kirk TuckerThompson & KnightFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- David N. ShineFried FrankFirst linked May 2012 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Alan J. BogdanowVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Apr 2012 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Christopher EwanFried FrankFirst linked Apr 2012 · Text search only · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Stephen M. GillVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Apr 2012 · Text search only · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amy R. CurtisThompson & Knight | May 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.88 |
| Kirk TuckerThompson & Knight | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| David N. ShineFried Frank | May 2012 | Text search only | 9 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 1.13 |
| Alan J. BogdanowVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Apr 2012 | Text search only | 25 | 1.61 | 0.00 | 1.07 |
| Christopher EwanFried Frank | Apr 2012 | Text search only | 29 | 0.70 | 0.88 | 0.00 |
| Stephen M. GillVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Apr 2012 | Text search only | 33 | 1.69 | 0.00 | 1.17 |