Vivo Participacoes S.A.
CIK 1071337Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jan 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Oct 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,397 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Oct 2003 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jan 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 741 | 1.30 | 0.12 | 0.72 |
| Davis Polk | Sep 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Oct 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,397 | 1.27 | 0.11 | 0.88 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Oct 2003 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andres V. GilDavis PolkFirst linked Jul 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Diane G. KerrDavis PolkFirst linked Apr 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.40×
- John C. EricsonSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- S. Todd CriderSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Dec 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Manuel GarciadiazDavis PolkFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andres V. GilDavis Polk | Jul 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.45 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| Diane G. KerrDavis Polk | Apr 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 3.40 |
| John C. EricsonSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Sep 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 1.26 |
| S. Todd CriderSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Dec 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.66 | 0.00 | 0.59 |
| Manuel GarciadiazDavis Polk | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 40 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.80 |