TRIAD FINANCIAL SM LLC
CIK 1071004Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jul 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Dewey BallantineFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in a filing · 228 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.03× · Went dark 0.29× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Dechert LLPFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 434 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Dykema GossettFirst linked Oct 2005 · Text search only · 115 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.23× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Oct 2005 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jul 2005 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jul 2005 · Text search only · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Brown & WoodFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 299 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jul 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Dewey Ballantine | Jun 2002 | Named in a filing | 228 | 2.03 | 0.29 | 0.87 |
| Dechert LLP | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 434 | 0.84 | 0.41 | 0.96 |
| Dykema Gossett | Oct 2005 | Text search only | 115 | 0.95 | 0.23 | 0.87 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Oct 2005 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jul 2005 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jul 2005 | Text search only | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Brown & Wood | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 299 | 1.53 | 0.47 | 0.58 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dennis M. MyersKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jul 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Nicholas G. DemmoWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jul 2005 · Text search only · 62 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dennis M. MyersKirkland & Ellis | Jul 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 69 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.64 |
| Nicholas G. DemmoWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jul 2005 | Text search only | 62 | 1.60 | 0.00 | 0.85 |