ACHILLION PHARMACEUTICALS INC ACHN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1070336Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- 96%
- Jan 2007 to Dec 2008
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Nov 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Feb 2017 · Text search only · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Reed SmithFirst linked Sep 2010 · Text search only · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Oct 2008 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- COHN BIRNBAUM & SHEAFirst linked Mar 2006 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.30× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.20×
- Sills Cummis & GrossFirst linked Mar 2006 · Text search only · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Nov 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| HALE AND DORR | Mar 2006 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Mar 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Cooley LLP | Feb 2017 | Text search only | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Reed Smith | Sep 2010 | Text search only | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
| Goodwin Procter | Oct 2008 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| COHN BIRNBAUM & SHEA | Mar 2006 | Text search only | 9 | 2.30 | 0.00 | 2.20 |
| Sills Cummis & Gross | Mar 2006 | Text search only | 44 | 1.02 | 0.82 | 0.93 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Katherine D. AshleySkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Nov 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- Graham RobinsonSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Nov 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Cynthia T. MazareasWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Jennifer BerrentHALE AND DORRFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.79×
- Susan L. MazurLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Steven D. SingerWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.37× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- David E. RedlickWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Mar 2006 · Text search only · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Ira A. RosenbergSills Cummis & GrossFirst linked Mar 2006 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.06× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.60×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katherine D. AshleySkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Nov 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.67 |
| Graham RobinsonSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Nov 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 42 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 0.69 |
| Cynthia T. MazareasWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Nov 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 0.49 | 0.00 | 1.13 |
| Jennifer BerrentHALE AND DORR | Jun 2011 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.90 | 0.00 | 1.79 |
| Susan L. MazurLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.39 |
| Steven D. SingerWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Mar 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 42 | 0.37 | 0.00 | 1.27 |
| David E. RedlickWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Mar 2006 | Text search only | 51 | 1.24 | 0.33 | 1.01 |
| Ira A. RosenbergSills Cummis & Gross | Mar 2006 | Text search only | 10 | 2.06 | 0.00 | 2.60 |