GOLDLEAF FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS INC. GFSI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1069469Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Nelson MullinsFirst linked May 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 301 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.50× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Harwell Howard Hyne Gabbert & Manner, P.C.First linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.93×
- Shaw PittmanFirst linked Apr 2006 · Text search only · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Apr 2006 · Text search only · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nelson Mullins | May 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 301 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.88 |
| Harwell Howard Hyne Gabbert & Manner, P.C. | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 25 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 1.93 |
| Shaw Pittman | Apr 2006 | Text search only | 149 | 0.98 | 0.53 | 1.08 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Apr 2006 | Text search only | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Charles D. VaughnNelson MullinsFirst linked May 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.87× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Susan V. SidwellHarwell Howard Hyne Gabbert & Manner, P.C.First linked May 2001 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
- MARK MANNERHarwell Howard Hyne Gabbert & Manner, P.C.First linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Caroline B. GottschalkSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Apr 2006 · Text search only · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- David CoxHarwell Howard Hyne Gabbert & Manner, P.C.First linked Jan 2004 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.88×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charles D. VaughnNelson Mullins | May 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.63 | 0.87 | 1.39 |
| Susan V. SidwellHarwell Howard Hyne Gabbert & Manner, P.C. | May 2001 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.81 | 0.00 | 0.68 |
| MARK MANNERHarwell Howard Hyne Gabbert & Manner, P.C. | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Caroline B. GottschalkSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Apr 2006 | Text search only | 18 | 1.56 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| David CoxHarwell Howard Hyne Gabbert & Manner, P.C. | Jan 2004 | Text search only | 7 | 3.19 | 0.00 | 1.88 |