SECURE POINT TECHNOLOGIES INC IMSC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1068874Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Oct 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Apr 2004 to Dec 2009
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Oct 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Foley HoagFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Feldman WeinsteinFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 278 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Oct 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Foley Hoag | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 186 | 0.72 | 0.95 | 1.17 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| Feldman Weinstein | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 278 | 0.92 | 1.17 | 1.20 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sarah WilliamsEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Dec 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 1.90× · 95% wipeout 1.66×
- David SelengutEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Oct 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 1.80× · 95% wipeout 1.99×
- Dave BroadwinFoley HoagFirst linked Apr 1999 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 4.48× · 95% wipeout 2.31×
- David A. BroadwinFoley HoagFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.45× · Went dark 2.63× · 95% wipeout 1.95×
- Robert W. Sweet Jr.Foley HoagFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.87× · Went dark 1.94× · 95% wipeout 2.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sarah WilliamsEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Dec 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 49 | 1.71 | 1.90 | 1.66 |
| David SelengutEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Oct 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 36 | 1.41 | 1.80 | 1.99 |
| Dave BroadwinFoley Hoag | Apr 1999 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.20 | 4.48 | 2.31 |
| David A. BroadwinFoley Hoag | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 20 | 0.45 | 2.63 | 1.95 |
| Robert W. Sweet Jr.Foley Hoag | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 19 | 0.87 | 1.94 | 2.13 |