RTI INTERNATIONAL METALS INC RTI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1068717Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Aug 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jul 2015 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly LLPFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in a filing · 91 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Buchanan Ingersoll Professional CorporationFirst linked Feb 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 123 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Doepken Keevican & Weiss Professional CorporationFirst linked Aug 1998 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.19× · Went dark 1.25× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Aug 2009 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jul 2015 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly LLP | Apr 2013 | Named in a filing | 91 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.77 |
| Buchanan Ingersoll Professional Corporation | Feb 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 123 | 1.14 | 0.73 | 1.47 |
| Doepken Keevican & Weiss Professional Corporation | Aug 1998 | Named in a filing | 10 | 2.19 | 1.25 | 1.06 |
| Morgan Lewis | Aug 2009 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ronald C. ChenWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jul 2015 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Brian S. NorthBuchanan Ingersoll Professional CorporationFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.39× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 2.39×
- Jennifer R. MinterBuchanan Ingersoll Professional CorporationFirst linked Dec 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ronald C. ChenWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jul 2015 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Brian S. NorthBuchanan Ingersoll Professional Corporation | Apr 2014 | Named in a filing | 13 | 2.39 | 0.88 | 2.39 |
| Jennifer R. MinterBuchanan Ingersoll Professional Corporation | Dec 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 1.05 |