PARK OHIO INDUSTRIES INC/OH
CIK 1068148Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Apr 2017
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jones DayFirst linked Jul 1999 · Named in a filing · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Ice MillerFirst linked Jun 2017 · Text search only · 112 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Bradley Arant Boult CummingsFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Plunkett CooneyFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Bradley Arant Rose & WhiteFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.54× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.29×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jones Day | Jul 1999 | Named in a filing | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Ice Miller | Jun 2017 | Text search only | 112 | 1.19 | 0.21 | 0.93 |
| Bradley Arant Boult Cummings | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 58 | 1.11 | 0.00 | 0.73 |
| Plunkett Cooney | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 6 | 1.95 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Bradley Arant Rose & White | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 32 | 1.54 | 0.00 | 0.29 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael J. SoleckiCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked May 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 48 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.84×
- Christopher M. KellyJones DayFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in a filing · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- DAVID P. PORTERJones DayFirst linked Jul 1999 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.36×
- Michael J. Solecki Jones DayCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Jun 2017 · Text search only · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael J. SoleckiCravath Swaine & Moore | May 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 48 | 1.08 | 0.00 | 1.84 |
| Christopher M. KellyJones Day | Mar 2005 | Named in a filing | 56 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 0.64 |
| DAVID P. PORTERJones Day | Jul 1999 | Named in a filing | 19 | 1.25 | 0.00 | 0.36 |
| Michael J. Solecki Jones DayCravath Swaine & Moore | Jun 2017 | Text search only | 33 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 0.88 |