ANGLOGOLD ASHANTI (PTY) LTD
CIK 1067428Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cains Advocates LimitedFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Dorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Feb 2008 · Named in a filing · 630 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Davis Graham & StubbsFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in a filing · 142 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Herbert SmithFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cains Advocates Limited | Jul 2012 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.50 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Jul 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Dorsey & Whitney LLP | Feb 2008 | Named in a filing | 630 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 1.16 |
| Davis Graham & Stubbs | Dec 2002 | Named in a filing | 142 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 1.46 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Dec 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Herbert Smith | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 90 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 0.65 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- George A. StephanakisCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.89×
- William J. Whelan IIICravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- George A. CaseyShearman & SterlingFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
- Pamela GibsonShearman & SterlingFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| George A. StephanakisCravath Swaine & Moore | Jul 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 2.57 | 0.00 | 1.89 |
| William J. Whelan IIICravath Swaine & Moore | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 51 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 0.52 |
| George A. CaseyShearman & Sterling | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 7 | 1.77 | 0.00 | 1.80 |
| Pamela GibsonShearman & Sterling | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 6 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 0.00 |