BANK ONE CORP ONE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1067092Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Sep 2000 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jun 1999 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jul 1998 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Feb 2016 · Text search only · 1,397 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Oct 2001 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Sep 2000 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.78 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jun 1999 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.82 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jul 1998 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.29 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Feb 2016 | Text search only | 1,397 | 1.27 | 0.11 | 0.88 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Oct 2001 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.82 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Edward D. HerlihyWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jul 1998 · Named in a filing · 148 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.42×
- Lee MeyersonSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Feb 2016 · Text search only · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
- Lesley PengSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Feb 2016 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
- William V. FoggCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Feb 2016 · Text search only · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edward D. HerlihyWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jul 1998 | Named in a filing | 148 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 0.42 |
| Lee MeyersonSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Feb 2016 | Text search only | 44 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.54 |
| Lesley PengSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Feb 2016 | Text search only | 13 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 1.50 |
| William V. FoggCravath Swaine & Moore | Feb 2016 | Text search only | 38 | 1.64 | 0.00 | 1.15 |