WHIRLPOOL CORP WHR (last ticker on record)
CIK 106640Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jul 2026
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Apr 2018 · Named in a filing · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in a filing · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in a filing · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2000 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Altheimer & GrayFirst linked Oct 1998 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.60× · Went dark 4.27× · 95% wipeout 1.84×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sidley Austin | Apr 2018 | Named in a filing | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| DLA Piper | Mar 2006 | Named in a filing | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Mayer Brown | Nov 2005 | Named in a filing | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Sep 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Mar 2000 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Altheimer & Gray | Oct 1998 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.60 | 4.27 | 1.84 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael J. AielloWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Apr 2018 · Named in a filing · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Sachin KohliWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Apr 2018 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.82× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert M. HaywardKirkland & EllisFirst linked Oct 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Hal M. BrownRUDNICK & WOLFEFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- John R. SaganMayer BrownFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 6.60× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Ellen J. OdonerWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Thomas A. RobertsWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael J. AielloWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Apr 2018 | Named in a filing | 107 | 1.23 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| Sachin KohliWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Apr 2018 | Named in a filing | 26 | 1.82 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robert M. HaywardKirkland & Ellis | Oct 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 38 | 1.78 | 0.00 | 1.19 |
| Hal M. BrownRUDNICK & WOLFE | Mar 2006 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| John R. SaganMayer Brown | Feb 2006 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.14 | 6.60 | 0.00 |
| Ellen J. OdonerWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Sep 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 1.39 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Thomas A. RobertsWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Sep 2005 | Named in a filing | 15 | 0.82 | 0.00 | 0.74 |