INET TECHNOLOGIES INC INET (last ticker on record)
CIK 1065351Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stoel RivesFirst linked Oct 2004 · Named in a filing · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in a filing · 398 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLPFirst linked Jul 1998 · Named in a filing · 350 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
- Strasburger & PriceFirst linked Sep 2003 · Text search only · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.87× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stoel Rives | Oct 2004 | Named in a filing | 208 | 0.84 | 0.67 | 1.20 |
| Andrews Kurth LLP | Sep 2003 | Named in a filing | 398 | 1.27 | 0.35 | 1.30 |
| Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP | Jul 1998 | Named in a filing | 350 | 1.17 | 0.81 | 1.52 |
| Strasburger & Price | Sep 2003 | Text search only | 39 | 0.87 | 1.01 | 1.23 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jason M. BrauserStoel RivesFirst linked Oct 2004 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- John R. ThomasPerkins CoieFirst linked Oct 2004 · Named in a filing · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.37× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
- J. Matthew LyonsAndrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Jul 1998 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- RONALD G. SKLOSSBrobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLPFirst linked Jul 1998 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.07×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jason M. BrauserStoel Rives | Oct 2004 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.40 |
| John R. ThomasPerkins Coie | Oct 2004 | Named in a filing | 44 | 0.37 | 0.00 | 1.56 |
| J. Matthew LyonsAndrews Kurth LLP | Jul 1998 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.06 | 0.00 | 1.38 |
| RONALD G. SKLOSSBrobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP | Jul 1998 | Named in a filing | 5 | 2.04 | 0.00 | 2.07 |