CENTRUS ENERGY CORP LEU (last ticker on record)
CIK 1065059Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Bankruptcy
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Feb 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- 97%
- Sep 2014 to Jan 2016
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Nov 2026 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Jun 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Thompson CoburnFirst linked Jun 2017 · Named in a filing · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- SNR Denton US LLPFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in a filing · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.92×
- Sonnenschein Nath & RosenthalFirst linked May 2009 · Named in a filing · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jun 1998 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Nov 2026 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Jun 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
| Thompson Coburn | Jun 2017 | Named in a filing | 85 | 1.13 | 1.01 | 1.33 |
| SNR Denton US LLP | Apr 2011 | Named in a filing | 28 | 0.29 | 0.00 | 1.92 |
| Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal | May 2009 | Named in a filing | 160 | 1.08 | 0.56 | 1.23 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jun 1998 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joshua R. CammakerWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Nov 2026 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
- Ryan CoombsO Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Oct 2021 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark — · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Eric C. SibbittO Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Oct 2020 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Michele C. KloeppelThompson CoburnFirst linked Jun 2017 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Andrew E. ZuckermanReid and RiegeFirst linked Jun 2012 · Named in a filing · 72 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Patrick H. ShannonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2007 · Named in a filing · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.75×
- Scott C. HerlihyLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 1.15× · 95% wipeout 1.74×
- Paul T. ShultzFirst linked Nov 2002 · Named in a filing · 136 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Pankaj K. SinhaSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Nov 1998 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.82× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Stephen W. HamiltonSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Nov 1998 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joshua R. CammakerWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Nov 2026 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 1.59 |
| Ryan CoombsO Melveny & Myers LLP | Oct 2021 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.00 | — | 0.80 |
| Eric C. SibbittO Melveny & Myers LLP | Oct 2020 | Named in a filing | 15 | 2.29 | 0.00 | 1.48 |
| Michele C. KloeppelThompson Coburn | Jun 2017 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Andrew E. ZuckermanReid and Riege | Jun 2012 | Named in a filing | 72 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 0.72 |
| Patrick H. ShannonLatham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2007 | Named in a filing | 32 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.75 |
| Scott C. HerlihyLatham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 1.15 | 1.15 | 1.74 |
| Paul T. Shultz | Nov 2002 | Named in a filing | 136 | 1.34 | 0.18 | 1.49 |
| Pankaj K. SinhaSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Nov 1998 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.82 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| Stephen W. HamiltonSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Nov 1998 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.45 | 0.00 | 1.38 |