SUNCOM WIRELESS INC
CIK 1064735Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Perkins CoieFirst linked Jun 2013 · Named in a filing · 511 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Dow LohnesFirst linked Jul 1999 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 1998 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Patton BoggsFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Dec 2001 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perkins Coie | Jun 2013 | Named in a filing | 511 | 0.93 | 0.27 | 0.98 |
| Dow Lohnes | Jul 1999 | Named in a filing | 36 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 1.08 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jun 1998 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Patton Boggs | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 186 | 0.92 | 0.76 | 1.35 |
| Sidley Austin | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Dec 2001 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Thomas D. TwedtDow LohnesFirst linked Jul 1999 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Eric A. DeJongPerkins CoieFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Jason DayPerkins CoieFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas D. TwedtDow Lohnes | Jul 1999 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.08 | 0.00 | 0.76 |
| Eric A. DeJongPerkins Coie | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 25 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 1.09 |
| Jason DayPerkins Coie | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 29 | 0.53 | 0.98 | 1.00 |