MILLAR WESTERN FOREST PRODUCTS LTD
CIK 1064408Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Mar 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Fraser Milner CasgrainFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in a filing · 66 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in a filing · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Borden Ladner Gervais LLPFirst linked Mar 2012 · Text search only · 78 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Lawson LundellFirst linked Mar 2012 · Text search only · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.84× · 95% wipeout 0.19×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Feb 2004 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Mar 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Fraser Milner Casgrain | Feb 2004 | Named in a filing | 66 | 0.98 | 0.18 | 0.72 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Feb 2004 | Named in a filing | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Borden Ladner Gervais LLP | Mar 2012 | Text search only | 78 | 0.46 | 0.00 | 1.25 |
| Lawson Lundell | Mar 2012 | Text search only | 27 | 0.35 | 0.84 | 0.19 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Feb 2004 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Christian G. KurtzPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Apr 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Adam M. GivertzPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Mar 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Brice T. VoranShearman & SterlingFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christian G. KurtzPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Apr 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| Adam M. GivertzPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Mar 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 43 | 0.84 | 0.00 | 0.66 |
| Brice T. VoranShearman & Sterling | Feb 2004 | Named in a filing | 11 | 2.49 | 0.00 | 0.67 |