HARRINGTON WEST FINANCIAL GROUP INC/CA HWFG (last ticker on record)
CIK 1063997Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Reitner, Stuart & MooreFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Kelley Drye & WarrenFirst linked Aug 2002 · Named in a filing · 152 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Chapman and CutlerFirst linked Aug 2002 · Text search only · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.32× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLPFirst linked Aug 2002 · Text search only · 169 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reitner, Stuart & Moore | Aug 2005 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.04 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Kelley Drye & Warren | Aug 2002 | Named in a filing | 152 | 1.24 | 0.53 | 1.21 |
| Chapman and Cutler | Aug 2002 | Text search only | 95 | 1.17 | 0.32 | 0.93 |
| Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP | Aug 2002 | Text search only | 169 | 0.88 | 0.82 | 1.25 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kenneth E. MooreReitner, Stuart & MooreFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
- John F. StuartReitner, Stuart & MooreFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Jeffrey D. HaasPatton BoggsFirst linked Aug 2002 · Named in a filing · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.52× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Norman B. AntinPatton BoggsFirst linked Aug 2002 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.56× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Dave M. MuchnikoffSilver, Freedman, Taff & Tiernan LLPFirst linked Aug 2002 · Text search only · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.28× · Went dark 1.45× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenneth E. MooreReitner, Stuart & Moore | Dec 2009 | Named in a filing | 20 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 0.55 |
| John F. StuartReitner, Stuart & Moore | Aug 2005 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.52 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Jeffrey D. HaasPatton Boggs | Aug 2002 | Named in a filing | 28 | 0.52 | 0.82 | 0.69 |
| Norman B. AntinPatton Boggs | Aug 2002 | Named in a filing | 24 | 0.56 | 0.88 | 0.83 |
| Dave M. MuchnikoffSilver, Freedman, Taff & Tiernan LLP | Aug 2002 | Text search only | 29 | 0.28 | 1.45 | 0.88 |