PROSPECT MEDICAL HOLDINGS INC PZZ (last ticker on record)
CIK 1063561Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- TroyGould PCFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 1.37× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Theodora Oringher PCFirst linked Aug 2008 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- MILLER & HOLGUINFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.05× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 2009 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Littman KrooksFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.65× · 95% wipeout 2.07×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Sheppard MullinFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 392 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TroyGould PC | Sep 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 125 | 0.73 | 1.37 | 1.25 |
| Theodora Oringher PC | Aug 2008 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.14 |
| MILLER & HOLGUIN | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.00 | 2.05 | 0.67 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Sep 2009 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Davis Wright Tremaine LLP | May 2004 | Text search only | 130 | 0.97 | 0.59 | 1.27 |
| Foley & Lardner | May 2004 | Text search only | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.02 |
| Littman Krooks | May 2004 | Text search only | 32 | 0.88 | 0.65 | 2.07 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | May 2004 | Text search only | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Sheppard Mullin | May 2004 | Text search only | 392 | 1.12 | 0.81 | 1.22 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Neal H. BrockmeyerHeller EhrmanFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Dale E. ShortTroyGould PCFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.52× · Went dark 1.42× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- J. BRAD WIGGINSMILLER & HOLGUINFirst linked May 2005 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.05× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- HOWARD J. UNTERBERGERMILLER & HOLGUINFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 3.03× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Howard A. SobelLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2010 · Text search only · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.33× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- John F. KennedyFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 190 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Mitchell C. LittmanLittman KrooksFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 1.43× · 95% wipeout 2.47×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neal H. BrockmeyerHeller Ehrman | Sep 2010 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.82 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Dale E. ShortTroyGould PC | Oct 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 2.52 | 1.42 | 1.26 |
| J. BRAD WIGGINSMILLER & HOLGUIN | May 2005 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.00 | 1.05 | 0.99 |
| HOWARD J. UNTERBERGERMILLER & HOLGUIN | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 3.03 | 0.00 |
| Howard A. SobelLatham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2010 | Text search only | 33 | 0.33 | 0.00 | 1.42 |
| John F. Kennedy | May 2004 | Text search only | 190 | 1.52 | 0.60 | 1.17 |
| Mitchell C. LittmanLittman Krooks | May 2004 | Text search only | 14 | 0.64 | 1.43 | 2.47 |