ACCPAC INTERNATIONAL INC
CIK 1063239Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in a filing · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- HOWARD, SMITH & LEVIN LLPFirst linked Aug 1998 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- HOWARD, DARBY & LEVINFirst linked Jun 1998 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- A&L GoodbodyFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Dickstein ShapiroFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Jones DayFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covington & Burling | Dec 2002 | Named in a filing | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.99 |
| HOWARD, SMITH & LEVIN LLP | Aug 1998 | Named in a filing | 5 | 2.95 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| HOWARD, DARBY & LEVIN | Jun 1998 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| A&L Goodbody | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 85 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| Dickstein Shapiro | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 41 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| Jones Day | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrea VachssCooley LLPFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Christopher M. KellyJones DayFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in a filing · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- PAUL V. ROGERSCovington & BurlingFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.29×
- Scott F. SmithCovington & BurlingFirst linked Jun 1998 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.36×
- Stephen A. InfanteCovington & BurlingFirst linked Jun 1998 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea VachssCooley LLP | Dec 2002 | Named in a filing | 15 | 0.56 | 0.00 | 0.88 |
| Christopher M. KellyJones Day | Dec 2002 | Named in a filing | 56 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 0.64 |
| PAUL V. ROGERSCovington & Burling | Dec 2002 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 2.29 |
| Scott F. SmithCovington & Burling | Jun 1998 | Named in a filing | 21 | 1.48 | 0.00 | 0.36 |
| Stephen A. InfanteCovington & Burling | Jun 1998 | Named in a filing | 9 | 2.24 | 0.00 | 0.64 |