NATIONSRENT INC
CIK 1062515Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Akerman LLPFirst linked Jun 1998 · Named in a filing · 211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Stroock & Stroock & LavanFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 178 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akerman LLP | Jun 1998 | Named in a filing | 211 | 1.09 | 0.67 | 1.39 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.81 |
| Ropes & Gray | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 914 | 0.97 | 0.14 | 0.91 |
| Stroock & Stroock & Lavan | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 178 | 0.98 | 0.78 | 0.89 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stephen K. RoddenberryAkerman LLPFirst linked Jun 1998 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.53×
- Christopher DoyleStroock & Stroock & LavanFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- John F. KennedyFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 190 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stephen K. RoddenberryAkerman LLP | Jun 1998 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.19 | 0.00 | 0.53 |
| Christopher DoyleStroock & Stroock & Lavan | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 6 | 1.67 | 0.00 | 1.40 |
| John F. Kennedy | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 190 | 1.52 | 0.60 | 1.19 |