GLOBAL CROSSING HOLDINGS LTD
CIK 1061323Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Appleby (Cayman) Ltd.First linked Dec 1998 · Named in a filing · 77 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- A&L GoodbodyFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Blake Cassels & GraydonFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 227 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.49× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Clifford Chance US LLPFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 260 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Jaffe Raitt Heuer & WeissFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.26× · Went dark 0.50× · 95% wipeout 1.65×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2006 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appleby (Cayman) Ltd. | Dec 1998 | Named in a filing | 77 | 1.62 | 1.12 | 1.18 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| DLA Piper | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| A&L Goodbody | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 85 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| Blake Cassels & Graydon | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 227 | 0.73 | 0.49 | 0.80 |
| Clifford Chance US LLP | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 260 | 0.92 | 0.41 | 0.85 |
| Jaffe Raitt Heuer & Weiss | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 37 | 0.26 | 0.50 | 1.65 |
| K&L Gates | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2006 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dennis D. LamontLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Peter M. LabonskiLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2006 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.48×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dennis D. LamontLatham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 16 | 0.56 | 0.00 | 1.39 |
| Peter M. LabonskiLatham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2006 | Text search only | 20 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.48 |