Viracta Therapeutics, Inc. VIRX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1061027Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jul 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Feb 2021 to Jul 2025
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jan 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked May 2021 · Text search only · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked May 2021 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Reed SmithFirst linked Apr 2013 · Text search only · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jan 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Cooley LLP | Dec 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| HALE AND DORR | May 2021 | Text search only | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | May 2021 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Reed Smith | Apr 2013 | Text search only | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Martin J. WatersWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jun 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.91× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 2.49×
- Marina RemennikCooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.47× · Went dark 2.49× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Glen Y. SatoCooley LLPFirst linked Mar 2012 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.50× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.66×
- Nicole BrookshireCooley LLPFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- Suzanne Sawochka HooperCooley LLPFirst linked May 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- William DavissonGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jan 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
- Alan C. MendelsonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- John T. McKennaCooley LLPFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 97 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- William C. DavissonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.83×
- Rama PadmanabhanCooley LLPFirst linked Dec 2020 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Kenneth A. ClarkWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jan 2005 · Text search only · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.41× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- John J. HuberLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2004 · Text search only · 61 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.74×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin J. WatersWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jun 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 1.91 | 0.88 | 2.49 |
| Marina RemennikCooley LLP | Nov 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.47 | 2.49 | 1.03 |
| Glen Y. SatoCooley LLP | Mar 2012 | Named in a filing | 17 | 1.50 | 0.00 | 1.66 |
| Nicole BrookshireCooley LLP | Aug 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 52 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 1.73 |
| Suzanne Sawochka HooperCooley LLP | May 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 1.30 |
| William DavissonGoodwin Procter | Jan 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 1.80 |
| Alan C. MendelsonLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 95 | 0.60 | 0.19 | 1.35 |
| John T. McKennaCooley LLP | Dec 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 97 | 0.53 | 0.43 | 1.10 |
| William C. DavissonLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2004 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.83 |
| Rama PadmanabhanCooley LLP | Dec 2020 | Text search only | 19 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.23 |
| Kenneth A. ClarkWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jan 2005 | Text search only | 42 | 0.41 | 0.88 | 1.38 |
| John J. HuberLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2004 | Text search only | 61 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 1.74 |