ICON PLC ICLR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1060955Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- A&L GoodbodyFirst linked Jan 2003 · Named in a filing · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jan 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jan 2003 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Emmet Marvin & MartinFirst linked Mar 2003 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A&L Goodbody | Jan 2003 | Named in a filing | 85 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 0.54 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Jan 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.75 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Jan 2003 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
| Emmet Marvin & Martin | Mar 2003 | Text search only | 199 | 0.81 | 0.16 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kimberly C. Petillo-DécossardCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Ross E. SturmanCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- William M. HartnettCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jan 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.15× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- William J. MillerCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Dec 2008 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.47×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimberly C. Petillo-DécossardCahill Gordon & Reindel | Mar 2021 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.39 |
| Ross E. SturmanCahill Gordon & Reindel | Mar 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.49 |
| William M. HartnettCahill Gordon & Reindel | Jan 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 1.27 |
| William J. MillerCahill Gordon & Reindel | Dec 2008 | Text search only | 20 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 0.47 |