INDYMAC ABS INC
CIK 1060764Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Heller EhrmanFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in a filing · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in a filing · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- [Thacher Proffitt LLP Letterhead]First linked Nov 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 197 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.10× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 1,211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Aug 1998 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Brown & WoodFirst linked May 1998 · Named in a filing · 299 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jun 2006 · Text search only · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heller Ehrman | Oct 2006 | Named in a filing | 256 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 1.02 |
| Mayer Brown | Oct 2006 | Named in a filing | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.93 |
| [Thacher Proffitt LLP Letterhead] | Nov 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 197 | 0.73 | 0.10 | 0.56 |
| Sidley Austin | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 1,211 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Aug 1998 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.78 |
| Brown & Wood | May 1998 | Named in a filing | 299 | 1.53 | 0.47 | 0.56 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jun 2006 | Text search only | 741 | 1.30 | 0.12 | 0.72 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kathryn Cruze[Thacher Proffitt LLP Letterhead]First linked Nov 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- EDWARD J. FINESidley AustinFirst linked May 1998 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 4.05× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathryn Cruze[Thacher Proffitt LLP Letterhead] | Nov 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| EDWARD J. FINESidley Austin | May 1998 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.19 | 4.05 | 1.07 |