COLLECTIVE BRANDS, INC. PSS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1060232Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Aug 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Mar 2000 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Apr 1998 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Mar 2000 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.29 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Apr 1998 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Scott B. CroftonSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.47×
- HAROLD J. HERMANVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Oct 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Edward D. HerlihyWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Mar 2000 · Named in a filing · 148 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.42×
- Francis J. AquilaSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Apr 1998 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.34×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott B. CroftonSullivan & Cromwell | Jul 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 1.09 | 0.00 | 0.47 |
| HAROLD J. HERMANVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Oct 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Edward D. HerlihyWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Mar 2000 | Named in a filing | 148 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 0.42 |
| Francis J. AquilaSullivan & Cromwell | Apr 1998 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 1.52 | 0.00 | 0.34 |