AURORA FOODS INC
CIK 1060024Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jan 2001
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 0
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q/A (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q/A (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Armstrong TeasdaleFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 64 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Oct 2000 · Named in a filing · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- White & CaseFirst linked Jul 1998 · Named in a filing · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Richards & O'Neil, LLPFirst linked Apr 1998 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 1.34× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Armstrong Teasdale | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 64 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.51 |
| Ropes & Gray | Oct 2000 | Named in a filing | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| White & Case | Jul 1998 | Named in a filing | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Richards & O'Neil, LLP | Apr 1998 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.69 | 1.34 | 1.01 |